<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Cancer</title>
        <link>http://cancer.immunodefence.com/</link>
        <description></description>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2011</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 09:57:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
        
        <item>
            <title>Test Helps Reduce Risk of Death in Advanced Lung Cancer</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<span class="date">ScienceDaily (Oct. 11, 2011)</span> -- Researchers at 
the University of Colorado Cancer Center have developed a test that 
identifies key biomarkers in advanced lung cancer that helped reduce the
 risk of death by 36 percent over a 30- month period in a recent 
clinical trial. ]]></description>
            <link>http://cancer.immunodefence.com/2011/11/test-helps-reduce-risk.html</link>
            <guid>http://cancer.immunodefence.com/2011/11/test-helps-reduce-risk.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Lung Cancer</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">clinical trials</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">lung cancer</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">oncology</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 09:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Female Lung Cancer Rates Rise While They Drop For Males</title>
            <description><![CDATA[According to Cancer Council Australia, new research shows increased <a href="http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/info/lung-cancer/" title="What is Lung Cancer?">lung cancer</a>
 rates in Australian women, adding urgency to further de-glamorize 
tobacco smoking. The research should plead an urgent call for the 
federal Parliament's passage of plain packaging for tobacco bills. <br /><br />
Professor Ian Olver, Cancer Council Australia CEO, states a net increase
 in lung cancer incidence in Australian women compared with men could be
 due to chronological differences in smoking behavior between the males 
and females, saying: 
<br /><br /><blockquote>
"Smoking prevalence in Australian men peaked in the 1940s while in women
 it was the mid-70s, so it's not surprising lung cancer rates in men are
 declining while they are on the rise in women. In the 1940s tobacco 
products were heavily promoted to men, while in the 1960s and '70s the 
tobacco companies sought to exploit the female market with brand names 
like "Slims", menthol cigarettes and packaging stylized to appeal to 
women."</blockquote> ]]></description>
            <link>http://cancer.immunodefence.com/2011/11/female-lung-cancer.html</link>
            <guid>http://cancer.immunodefence.com/2011/11/female-lung-cancer.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Lung Cancer</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">lung cancer</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 09:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Acid reflux disease: Real and treatable</title>
            <description><![CDATA[We've all probably had acid reflux, otherwise known as "heartburn,"
from time to time, perhaps after eating too much or eating certain
types of food. However, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a
serious, chronic disease for some individuals, and overeating is not
the only cause.<br /><br />According to the <a href="http://%20http//digestive.niddk.nih.gov/ddiseases/pubs/gerd/">National Digestive Diseases Information Clearing House</a>
of the NIH, the causes of GERD remain unclear. Research shows that in
individuals with GERD, the lower esophageal sphincter relaxes while the
rest of the esophagus is working. In addition, anatomical abnormalities
such as a hiatal hernia may also contribute and such hernias can occur
at any age. <br /><br />Other factors that may contribute are obesity, pregnancy, smoking and certain foods.<br /><br />Chronic
GERD that goes without treatment can cause serious complications such
as damage, bleeding or ulcers on the lining of the esophagus or
narrowing of the esophagus. Some people can develop Barrett's
esophagus, in which the cells in the esophageal lining change and can
eventually turn into esophageal cancer, which is usually fatal. <br /><br />You
do not need to have classic "heartburn" symptoms to have GERD; other
symptoms include a dry cough, asthma symptoms or trouble swallowing. If
you have been using antacids for more than two weeks, it's time to see
a doctor. <br /><br />Acid reflux is real and treatable. If you or someone
you love experiences chronic heartburn, make sure you see your
physician or a gastroenterologist for treatment.<br /><br />Source: <a href="http://www.thecancerblog.com/2007/07/26/acid-reflux-disease-real-and-treatable/">theCancerBlog</a><br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://cancer.immunodefence.com/2009/04/acid-reflux-disease-real-and-t.html</link>
            <guid>http://cancer.immunodefence.com/2009/04/acid-reflux-disease-real-and-t.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">General Cancer News</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Stomach Cancer</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">acid reflux</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">AcidReflux</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">esophageal cancer</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">EsophagealCancer</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">GERD</category>
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>FDA Documents Reveal HPV &quot;Not Associated with Cervical Cancer&quot;</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/fda_logo.jpg" border="0" alt="FDA" title="FDA" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="100" height="107" align="left" />(NewsTarget) For the last several years, HPV vaccines have been marketed to the public and mandated in compulsory injections for young girls in several states based on the idea that they prevent cervical cancer. Now, NewsTarget has obtained documents from the FDA and other sources (see below) which reveal that the FDA has been well aware for several years that Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) has no direct link to cervical cancer.<br /><br />NewsTarget has also learned that HPV vaccines have been proven to be flatly worthless in clearing the HPV virus from women who have already been exposed to HPV (which includes most sexually active women), calling into question the scientific justification of mandatory &quot;vaccinate everyone&quot; policies.<br /><br />Furthermore, this story reveals evidence that the vaccine currently being administered for HPV -- Gardasil -- may increase the risk of precancerous cervical lesions by an alarming 44.6 percent in some women. The vaccine, it turns out, may be far more dangerous to the health of women than doing nothing at all.]]></description>
            <link>http://cancer.immunodefence.com/2007/12/fda-documents-reveal-hpv-not-a.html</link>
            <guid>http://cancer.immunodefence.com/2007/12/fda-documents-reveal-hpv-not-a.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Cervical Cancer</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">cervical cancer</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">FDA</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">gardasil</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">HPV</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">safety</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Processed Meat Unsafe For Human Consumption; Cancer Experts Warn of Dietary Dangers</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/obese_child.jpg" border="0" alt="processed meats" title="processed meats" hspace="2" vspace="1" width="100" height="150" align="right" />by Mike Adams </p><p> World cancer experts have finally declared what NewsTarget readers learned nearly four years ago: That processed meats cause cancer, and anyone seeking to avoid cancer should avoid eating all processed meats for life.</p><p>Hundreds of cancer researchers took part in a five-year project spanning more than 7,000 clinical studies and designed to document the links between diet and cancer. Their conclusion, published in the World Cancer Research Fund&#39;s report, Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity and the Prevention of Cancer: a Global Perspective (2007), has rocked the health world with a declaration that all people should immediately stop buying and eating <a href="http://www.newstarget.com/processed_meat.html">processed meat</a> products and that all processed meat should be avoided for life!</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://cancer.immunodefence.com/2007/11/processed-meat-unsafe-for-huma.html</link>
            <guid>http://cancer.immunodefence.com/2007/11/processed-meat-unsafe-for-huma.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">General Cancer News</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">cancer causes</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">processed meats</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">sodium nitrite</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">world cancer research fund</category>
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Cancer: Prevention is the cure</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/health.jpg" border="0" alt="healthy lifestyle" title="healthy lifestyle" hspace="2" vspace="1" width="150" height="100" align="left" />(NewsTarget) Many people have heard the saying &ldquo;an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure&rdquo;. When it comes to cancer, this couldn&rsquo;t be truer. To date several billion dollars, over 30 years have been spent on finding that elusive cure for cancer. What about cancer prevention? It is estimated that a woeful fraction of that amount of money has been spent on cancer prevention. The statistics from the Nutrition Journal state that cancer can be prevented in 30-40 percent of known cases through lifestyle factors, such as diet, exercise and maintaining a healthy body weight. The 30-40 percent stated as preventable by the Nutrition Journal, many in fact, be a conservative estimate, as suggested by many wellness practitioners. Cancer costs the US 107 billion annually. Finding a cure is costing us a great deal, but lack of prevention is costing us more.]]></description>
            <link>http://cancer.immunodefence.com/2007/10/cancer-prevention-is-the-cure.html</link>
            <guid>http://cancer.immunodefence.com/2007/10/cancer-prevention-is-the-cure.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">General Cancer News</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Cancer Prevention</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">diet</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">prevention</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Top 20 things that are more dangerous to children than lead paint in Mattel toys</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/medicine.jpg" border="0" alt="modern medicine" title="modern medicine" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="100" height="126" align="right" /><a href="http://www.newstarget.com/" target="_blank">NewsTarget</a> published a very interesting <a href="http://www.newstarget.com/022014.html" target="_blank">article</a> regarding different factors that are damaging our health.&nbsp;</p><blockquote>Parents directly poison their children every day with products far more dangerous than Mattel toys.</blockquote><p>&nbsp;Read the full article below </p>]]></description>
            <link>http://cancer.immunodefence.com/2007/09/top-20-things-that-are-more-da.html</link>
            <guid>http://cancer.immunodefence.com/2007/09/top-20-things-that-are-more-da.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">General Cancer News</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">cancer causes</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 10:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>UB study: Tonsil removal and breast cancer</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/tonsils.jpg" border="0" alt="tonsils" title="tonsils" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="100" height="144" align="left" /> Women who had their tonsils removed in childhood may be at increased risk of developing pre-menopausal breast cancer, according to University at Buffalo researchers. </p>  <p>Study leader Theodore Brasky said an apparent association may be related to the loss of protective function of the tonsils when they are removed. </p>  <p>Alternatively, tonsils that needed to be removed may have been markers for severe or chronic infections in childhood, and that such infections cause inflammation that may contribute to cancer, Brasky said. </p>]]></description>
            <link>http://cancer.immunodefence.com/2007/04/ub-study-tonsil-removal-and-br.html</link>
            <guid>http://cancer.immunodefence.com/2007/04/ub-study-tonsil-removal-and-br.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blood Cancer</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Breast Cancer</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Lymphoma</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">breast cancer</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">leukemia</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">lymphoma</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">research</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">risk factors</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">tonsils</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Abortion does not raise breast cancer risk</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/breast_cancer1.jpg" border="0" alt="breast cancer" title="breast cancer" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="145" height="100" align="right" />Abortion and miscarriage do not raise the risk of breast cancer, according to a study published Monday by the US National Cancer Institute in the Archives of Internal Medicine.</p> <p> The 10-year study, performed on a sample of 105,716 US participants, rejects prior studies that suggested a link between prematurely terminated pregnancies and breast cancer.</p> <p> The subjects were nurses aged 29-46 at the start of the study. They answered questions every two years via anonymous questionnaire about their medical history, including whether they had abortions, miscarriages and breast cancer.</p> <p> &quot;Among this predominantly pre-menopausal population, neither induced nor spontaneous abortion was associated with the incidence of breast cancer,&quot; said the study&#39;s authors from Brigham and Women&#39;s hospital and Harvard Medical School in the northeastern state of Massachusetts.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://cancer.immunodefence.com/2007/04/abortion-does-not-raise-breast.html</link>
            <guid>http://cancer.immunodefence.com/2007/04/abortion-does-not-raise-breast.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Breast Cancer</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">abortion</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">breast cancer</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">risk factors</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>DNA Variations Tied to Prostate Cancer Risk</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/prostate_cancer.jpg" border="0" alt="prostate cancer" title="prostate cancer" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="130" height="100" align="left" />Scientists have pinpointed a set of common variations in human DNA that signal a higher risk for prostate cancer in men who carry them. Some of these variations are more common in African-American men, which may help explain why prostate cancer rates are higher in African Americans than in men of other races. </p>  <p>The findings, published in 3 separate studies, may lead to genetic tests that will help identify those most at risk for the disease. The findings may also help unlock the biological mysteries behind prostate cancer, which could speed up the discovery of new treatments. </p>  <p>The 3 studies focus on DNA variations located on chromosome 8 in some men. The variations may be linked to as many as 68% of prostate cancer cases in African Americans, 60% in Japanese Americans, 46% in Latinos, 45% in native Hawaiians and 32% in whites, the authors of 1 of the studies calculate. </p>]]></description>
            <link>http://cancer.immunodefence.com/2007/04/dna-variations-tied-to-prostat.html</link>
            <guid>http://cancer.immunodefence.com/2007/04/dna-variations-tied-to-prostat.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Prostate Cancer</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">cancer causes</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">dna</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">prostate cancer</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">research</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">risk factors</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Hi-tech breast cancer weapon</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/breast_cancer2.jpg" border="0" alt="breast cancer" title="breast cancer" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="128" height="100" align="right" />CUTTING-edge technology to improve breast cancer detection rates by  30 per cent will be rolled out across the state under a package announced  yesterday.</p>The $26 million hi-tech breast screening process will  boost cancer discovery rates by introducing digital intelligence to replace  standard X-ray films.  <p>The 21st-century system is particularly useful for picking up breast cancers  in younger women, whose breast tissue is usually too dense to be filmed  accurately by the old machines.</p> <p>Breast cancer expert Dr Wendy Vincent said the new equipment would provide  instant images for both patient and doctor and would be invaluable in regional  NSW.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://cancer.immunodefence.com/2007/03/hitech-breast-cancer-weapon.html</link>
            <guid>http://cancer.immunodefence.com/2007/03/hitech-breast-cancer-weapon.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Breast Cancer</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">breast cancer</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">research</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>More Gene Mutations Drive Cancer Than Previously Thought</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/cancer_research.jpg" border="0" alt="cancer research" title="cancer research" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="100" height="100" align="left" />Scientists surveying the human genome have found that many more gene mutations  drive the development of cancer than previously thought.<br /><br />The survey is  reported in the journal Nature.<br /><br />In the largest survey of its kind,  an international team comprising over 60 scientists from the UK, Hong Kong, the  Netherlands, Belgium, USA and Australia, working for the Cancer Genome Project,  examined more than 500 genes and 200 cancers and sequenced more than 250 million  letters of DNA code. <br /><br />They found about 120 new genes that drive the  development of cancer cells.]]></description>
            <link>http://cancer.immunodefence.com/2007/03/more-gene-mutations-drive-canc.html</link>
            <guid>http://cancer.immunodefence.com/2007/03/more-gene-mutations-drive-canc.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">General Cancer News</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">cancer</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">gene mutations</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">research</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Gene that prevents cancer also controls the skin&apos;s suntanning machinery</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/sunlight.jpg" border="0" alt="sunlight" title="sunlight" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="100" height="133" align="right" />A gene that prevents cancer also controls the skin&#39;s suntanning machinery,  researchers report in the March 9, 2007 issue of the journal <a href="http://www.cell.com/" target="_blank">Cell</a>.</p> <p>&quot;The p53 tumor suppressor is commonly mutated in human cancer,&quot; explained  David Fisher, director of the Melanoma Program in Medical Oncology at  Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. &quot;Now, we&#39;ve found that it plays a role in the  skin&#39;s tanning response.&quot;</p> <p>The researchers also linked the p53-driven process to other instances of skin  darkening not associated with the sun</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://cancer.immunodefence.com/2007/03/gene-that-prevents-cancer-also.html</link>
            <guid>http://cancer.immunodefence.com/2007/03/gene-that-prevents-cancer-also.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">General Cancer News</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">p53 tumor supressor</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">research</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">sunlight</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Radiation for breast cancer ups heart disease risk</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/breast_cancer3.jpg" border="0" alt="breast cancer" title="breast cancer" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="100" height="111" align="left" />As a treatment for breast cancer, radiation, even modern regimens, appears to  increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, according to a report in the  Journal of the National Cancer Institute for March 7.</p> <p>Earlier reports have indicated that radiotherapy regimens used in the 1970s  elevate heart disease risk, but it has been less clear if more recent regimens  also increase the risk.</p> <p>Apart from the &quot;clear benefits&quot; of radiotherapy, doctors should still be  aware of the potentially increased risk of cardiovascular disease following  specific radiotherapy regimens in long-term breast cancer survivors, Dr. Flora  E. van Leeuwen, from the Netherlands Cancer Institute in Amsterdam, and  colleagues note in the report.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://cancer.immunodefence.com/2007/03/radiation-for-breast-cancer-up.html</link>
            <guid>http://cancer.immunodefence.com/2007/03/radiation-for-breast-cancer-up.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Breast Cancer</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">breast cancer</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">heart disease</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">radiation</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">risk factors</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Panel nixes aspirin as cancer preventive</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/aspirin.jpg" border="0" alt="aspirin" title="aspirin" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="100" height="137" align="right" />People at average risk for colon cancer shouldn&#39;t take aspirin or painkillers  like ibuprofen to try to prevent the disease, a federal task force advises,  because of the risk of bleeding and other potential health problems.  </p><p>The recommendation for the first time by the US Preventive Services Task  Force includes those with a family history of colorectal cancer.  </p><p>The panel said that potential risks of taking more than 300 milligrams a day  of aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, such as ibuprofen and  naproxen - brand names include Motrin, Advil and Aleve - include a higher risk  for stroke, intestinal bleeding or kidney failure. </p>]]></description>
            <link>http://cancer.immunodefence.com/2007/03/panel-nixes-aspirin-as-cancer.html</link>
            <guid>http://cancer.immunodefence.com/2007/03/panel-nixes-aspirin-as-cancer.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">General Cancer News</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">aspirin</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">cancer</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">risk factors</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

